Why the physical laws are considered universal?
This is a very interesting question, which one of my friends brought up:
why the physical laws are considered universal?
What I mean is that why do we believe that, say, Maxwell’s laws of electromagnetism is the same in a far away star as it is in our solar system?
It is true that we see their effect (e.g. in the form of light) the same as we predict them to behave, but isn’t it possible to observe the same thing from a far away, but the underlying mechanism that generates those ways be completely different? (so, in other words, their far-field effect is the same, but the near-field effect is different).
Is there any reason other than something like Occam’s razor principle?
I think the answer is that we can never be sure in a pure and abstract sense about this universality! The whole idea that “the physical laws are universal” is only a theory and not a law. However, it is a theory that makes a lot of sense and goes very well with the rationality and logic that we see in the physics so we never doubt it. Indeed, this is what we do in scientific method, which starts by observing (usually remotely), hypothesizing, and then testing. Of course, in this process Occam’s Razor principle also plays important role in the hypothesizing stage since it has been shown to be a logical choice empirically.
Let’s say we have tested 99% of the universe and have found that indeed the laws of universe were the same in these regions. We still cannot give verdict about the universality of physical laws until we test the remaining 1%. But what do we mean by testing? Do we actually need to go there and perform some measurement to make sure? Remember how David Scott replicated the Galileo experiment with a hammer and feather on the surface of the moon during Apollo 15 mission? But even before that experiment we already had a lot of data to be sure that indeed the gravitation law is valid on the moon too. In practice we rely on remote measurement to validate the models that we build for the universe around us. When we perform several complementary measurements and the outcome of these tests are in agreement with our theory, we will have higher confidence about the validity of our theory.
There is also the “principle of sufficient reason” as stated by Liebniz, which may be applicable to this question. If we assume that any of the fundamental physical laws in a remote region of universe is different from our own, there should be a sufficient reason for that. However, at the fundamental level of physical laws, the space is a relative parameter meaning that there won’t be a sufficient reason for one region of space to have a difference from another region in having a different underlying physical laws. Of course, this is true only if we assume that the physical laws themselves are not changed or altered by the local matter and energy.
I remember watching a documentary about the life of Newton. At one point, Netwon was telling how at very young age he believed that the stars were the lights of sun passing through holes that exist in the night sky! When you think about it, this cannot be disproved immediately but it leads to a lot of new questions that are even more difficult to answer than the original question. This is exactly where Occum’s razor principle enters the scene and we see the other picture and structure we assume for the night sky are more rational and have a simpler explanation. So we trust this picture until a new and better theory come along.
Now, the idea that the laws of physics have been universally constant at all time, is totally separate issue, which Smolin questions it in his book where he speaks of evolution of universal laws along with the evolution of universe.
* Picture courtesy of International Association
6 Responses so far
January 20th, 2008
4:02 pm
[…] را پرسیدم. نادر در وبلاگاش بهام پاسخ داده است. پاسخاش را در اینجا […]
October 19th, 2008
12:26 am
Hello my friends!
The interesting name of a site - 4seconds.microblog.info
I at night 6 hours
sat in the Internet So I have found your site
The interesting site but does not suffice several sections!
However this section is very necessary!
Best wishes for you!
Forgive I is drunk :))
November 29th, 2008
5:09 am
I very much love summer



Someone very much loves winter
I Wish to know whom more
For what you love winter?
For what you love summer? Let’s argue
December 19th, 2008
5:22 am
Hi people
As newly registered user i only wanted to say hello to everyone else who uses this forum
November 9th, 2009
5:55 pm
DEEP-SPACE TRAVEL If the launching of LightSail-1 goes off according to plan next year, humans may soon be solar-sailing, as shown in this illustration.
About a year from now, if all goes well, a box about the size of a loaf of bread will pop out of a rocket some 500 miles above the Earth. There in the vacuum it will unfurl four triangular sails as shiny as moonlight and only barely more substantial. Then it will slowly rise on a sunbeam and move across the stars.
LightSail-1, as it is dubbed, will not make it to Neverland. At best the device will sail a few hours and gain a few miles in altitude. But those hours will mark a milestone for a dream that is almost as old as the rocket age itself, and as romantic: to navigate the cosmos on winds of starlight the way sailors for thousands of years have navigated the ocean on the winds of the Earth.
“Sailing on light is the only technology that can someday take us to the stars,” said Louis Friedman, director of the Planetary Society, the worldwide organization of space enthusiasts.
Even as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration continues to flounder in a search for its future, Dr. Friedman announced Monday that the Planetary Society, with help from an anonymous donor, would be taking baby steps toward a future worthy of science fiction. Over the next three years, the society will build and fly a series of solar-sail spacecraft dubbed LightSails, first in orbit around the Earth and eventually into deeper space.
The voyages are an outgrowth of a long collaboration between the society and Cosmos Studios of Ithaca, N.Y., headed by Ann Druyan, a film producer and widow of the late astronomer and author Carl Sagan.
Sagan was a founder of the Planetary Society, in 1980, with Dr. Friedman and Bruce Murray, then director of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The announcement was made at the Hart Senate Office Building in Washington at a celebration of what would have been Sagan’s 75th birthday. He died in 1996.
Ms. Druyan, who has been chief fund-raiser for the society’s sailing projects, called the space sail “a Taj Mahal” for Sagan, who loved the notion and had embraced it as a symbol for the wise use of technology.
There is a long line of visionaries, stretching back to the Russian rocket pioneers Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and Fridrich Tsander and the author Arthur C. Clarke, who have supported this idea. “Sails are just a marvelous way of getting around the universe,” said Freeman Dyson, of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., and a longtime student of the future, “but it takes a long time to imagine them becoming practical.”
The solar sail receives its driving force from the simple fact that light carries not just energy but also momentum — a story told by every comet tail, which consists of dust blown by sunlight from a comet’s core. The force on a solar sail is gentle, if not feeble, but unlike a rocket, which fires for a few minutes at most, it is constant. Over days and years a big enough sail, say a mile on a side, could reach speeds of hundreds of thousands of miles an hour, fast enough to traverse the solar system in 5 years. Riding the beam from a powerful laser, a sail could even make the journey to another star system in 100 years, that is to say, a human lifespan.
Whether humans could ever take these trips depends on just how starry-eyed one’s view of the future is.
Dr. Friedman said it would take too long and involve too much exposure to radiation to sail humans to a place like Mars. He said the only passengers on an interstellar voyage — even after 200 years of additional technological development — were likely to be robots or perhaps our genomes encoded on a chip, a consequence of the need to keep the craft light, like a giant cosmic kite.
In principle, a solar sail can do anything a regular sail can do, like tacking. Unlike other spacecraft, it can act as an antigravity machine, using solar pressure to balance the Sun’s gravity and thus hover anyplace in space.
And, of course, it does not have to carry tons of rocket fuel. As the writer and folk singer Jonathan Eberhart wrote in his song “A Solar Privateer”:
No cold LOX tanks or reactor banks, just Mylar by the mile.
http://myspace-proxy.hi5.com - hide ip address
No stormy blast to rattle the mast, a sober wind and true.
Just haul and tack and ball the jack like the waterlubbers do.
Those are visions for the long haul. “Think centuries or millennia, not decades,” said Dr. Dyson, who also said he approved of the Planetary Society project.
“We ought to be doing things that are romantic,” he said, adding that nobody knew yet how to build sails big and thin enough for serious travel. “You have to get equipment for unrolling them and stretching them — a big piece of engineering that’s not been done. But the joy of technology is that it’s unpredictable.”
At one time or another, many of NASA’s laboratories have studied solar sails. Scientists at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory even once investigated sending a solar sail to rendezvous and ride along with Halley’s Comet during its pass in 1986.
July 6th, 2010
7:15 pm
Hi, anyone knows in which I can discover a web site to play pokies on the web? I have been shopping but I haven’t observed any so far.
The emotion you experience when you learn you missed by little is too a part of the exhilaration. To play pokies on the internet can be a pleasurable trend for some youth at present . It is likewise a harmless game to have fun with.
Leave a comment